• Home
  • Startup
  • Money & Finance
  • Starting a Business
    • Branding
    • Business Ideas
    • Business Models
    • Business Plans
    • Fundraising
  • Growing a Business
  • More
    • Innovation
    • Leadership
Trending

WIRED Roundup: The 5 Tech and Politics Trends That Shaped 2025

December 25, 2025

AMD CEO Lisa Su Says Concerns About an AI Bubble Are Overblown

December 23, 2025

Terrifying New Photos Emerge From the Jeffrey Epstein Estate

December 22, 2025
Facebook Twitter Instagram
  • Newsletter
  • Submit Articles
  • Privacy
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Facebook Twitter Instagram
UptownBudget
  • Home
  • Startup
  • Money & Finance
  • Starting a Business
    • Branding
    • Business Ideas
    • Business Models
    • Business Plans
    • Fundraising
  • Growing a Business
  • More
    • Innovation
    • Leadership
Subscribe for Alerts
UptownBudget
Home » Emergency Braking Will Save Lives. Automakers Want to Charge Extra for It
Startup

Emergency Braking Will Save Lives. Automakers Want to Charge Extra for It

adminBy adminJanuary 31, 20250 ViewsNo Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

The most challenging part of FMVSS 127 is the night-time Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking (PAEB) test, which, unlike the EU’s new AEB regulation, needs to work in complete darkness. More than 70 percent of pedestrians hit and killed by motorists are struck at night, according to NHTSA.

Protecting pedestrians at night is “likely to require further advancements and developments in sensor technologies,” states Nadine Wong, director of track testing at independent testing company Dynamic Research. Working from a test track 15 miles north of Bakersfield, California, Dynamic Research already conducts FMVSS 127 testing for clients. “We know that there are vehicles currently available that already come close to achieving the standard,” said Wong.

NHTSA acknowledges that FMVSS 127 is “technology-forcing,” but emphasizes that the “standard is practicable.”

FMVSS 127 is a “disastrous” rule that “will endlessly frustrate drivers [and] make vehicles more expensive … [and] won’t really improve driver or pedestrian safety.”

John Bozzella, president and CEO, Alliance for Automotive Innovation

While the industry would be on the hook for $354 million in mostly software development costs, US society would benefit to the tune of up to $7.26 billion, says NHSTA, citing reductions in costs for the “negative externalities” of serious car crashes such as emergency service call-outs, medical care, insurance administrative costs, workplace costs, and legal costs.

“Considering that automaking is America’s largest manufacturing sector, employs 10 million Americans, generates 5 percent of the US GDP, and drives $1 trillion into the economy annually,” says Chase, “it is remarkable that [the auto industry] would be unable to meet the requirements in the AEB rule by September 2029.”

In a press statement, William Wallace, Consumer Report’s director of safety advocacy, agreed: “It is profoundly disappointing that automakers are suing to block this lifesaving automatic emergency braking rule.”

Shaun Kildare, research director at the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, concurs. “When they say, ‘It’s impracticable, we can never meet this standard,’ it’s false because some auto companies are already selling vehicles in the US that do it,” he says, “and they’re definitely selling vehicles abroad that do it. [Auto companies] just don’t want to pay for it on every vehicle.”

Still, the Alliance’s Bozzella has called FMVSS 127 a “disastrous” rule that “will endlessly—and unnecessarily—frustrate drivers [and] make vehicles more expensive.” Somewhat strangely, Bozzella also claims that the more stringent standard, tougher even than the equivalent one in EU, “won’t really improve driver or pedestrian safety.”

However, the Alliance’s lawsuit ought to fail, says Chase. “NHTSA is risk averse. They like everything buttoned up. They would not have put out this rule if they thought it could be easily challenged.”

Late last year, NHTSA released a set of studies showing that more than 860,000 lives have been saved by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards since 1968. Frontal air bags alone have saved more than 50,000 lives over a 30-year period, estimates NHTSA.

President Trump nominated Sean Duffy to be the secretary of transportation, and he was duly confirmed on January 22. Duffy had told members of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation that road safety was “close to home” for him, explaining that his wife survived a head-on car crash. He vowed to prioritize road safety, including for pedestrians and bicyclists.

Trump also nominated Steven Bradbury to be deputy secretary of transportation. Bradbury is a fellow at right-wing think tank the Heritage Foundation, which wrote Project 2025, a 900-plus-page blueprint for government. Trump disavowed this plan during the election, but an analysis by Time.com has found that nearly two-thirds of the executive actions Trump has issued so far mirror or partially mirror proposals from Project 2025, including sweeping deregulation.

Project 2025’s transportation plans include reducing fuel economy standards and removing highway spending from pedestrian and bicycling projects. Project 2025 was also in favor of smaller government and fewer regulations, an ask likely to be supercharged by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.

On January 24, NHTSA said it would delay the effective date of FMVSS 127 to March 20 to give the new Trump administration time to further review the regulation.

It’s unknown whether Trump—or DOGE—will eventually kill FMVSS 127, but, says Norton, author also of a book on autonomous driving, “if we can’t get automakers to accept vehicle automation for safety, then we can’t expect them to be serious about fully robotic cars.”

Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Articles

WIRED Roundup: The 5 Tech and Politics Trends That Shaped 2025

Startup December 25, 2025

AMD CEO Lisa Su Says Concerns About an AI Bubble Are Overblown

Startup December 23, 2025

Terrifying New Photos Emerge From the Jeffrey Epstein Estate

Startup December 22, 2025

Why SpaceX Is Finally Gearing Up to Go Public

Startup December 20, 2025

OpenAI Rolls Back ChatGPT’s Model Router System for Most Users

Startup December 19, 2025

Crypto Magnate Do Kwon Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison

Startup December 17, 2025
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editors Picks

WIRED Roundup: The 5 Tech and Politics Trends That Shaped 2025

December 25, 2025

AMD CEO Lisa Su Says Concerns About an AI Bubble Are Overblown

December 23, 2025

Terrifying New Photos Emerge From the Jeffrey Epstein Estate

December 22, 2025

Why SpaceX Is Finally Gearing Up to Go Public

December 20, 2025

OpenAI Rolls Back ChatGPT’s Model Router System for Most Users

December 19, 2025

Latest Posts

You’re Thinking About AI and Water All Wrong

December 16, 2025

Trump Signs Executive Order That Threatens to Punish States for Passing AI Laws

December 15, 2025

Operation Bluebird Wants to Bring ‘Twitter’ Back to Life

December 13, 2025

‘Pluribus’ Just Set An All-Time Record For Apple TV

December 13, 2025

OpenAI Launches GPT-5.2 as It Navigates ‘Code Red’

December 12, 2025
Advertisement
Demo

UptownBudget is your one-stop website for the latest news and updates about how to start a business, follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest YouTube
Sections
  • Growing a Business
  • Innovation
  • Leadership
  • Money & Finance
  • Starting a Business
Trending Topics
  • Branding
  • Business Ideas
  • Business Models
  • Business Plans
  • Fundraising

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest business and startup news and updates directly to your inbox.

© 2025 UptownBudget. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.